ChjpHunter
Posts : 55 Join date : 2010-09-15
| Subject: Ministerial Conference in Seattle.[2] Sun Nov 28, 2010 8:00 am | |
| symbolized a new approach that was soon to be expressed conceptually by the term Global Commons. The emergence of conflicts over standards: trade and the environment, trade and social rights, trade and public health. These conflicts continued the traditional debate over the social effects of macroeconomic stabilization policies, and raised the question of arbitration among equally legitimate objectives in a compartmentalized governance system where the major areas of interdependence are each entrusted to a specialized international institution. Although often limited in scope, these conflicts are nevertheless symbolically powerful, as they raise the question of the principles and institutions of arbitration. An increased questioning of international standards and institutions by developing countries, which, having entered the global economy, find it hard to accept that industrialized countries hold onto power and give preference to their own interests. The challenge also comes from civil society, which considers that the international governance system has become the real seat of power and which rejects both its principles and procedures. Although these two lines of criticism often have conflicting beliefs and goals, they have been known to join in order to oppose the dominance of developed countries and major institutions, as demonstrated symbolically by the failure of the WTO 1999 Ministerial Conference in Seattle.[2]. retractable banner stands for trade showsinvitations miami fl | |
|